Big star ratings for AI SEO software, based on hands-on testing. Updated July 2026
The AI SEO Software Review See the agency pick
Google Sheets logo

Google Sheets

Google Sheets is the free manual method for AI search. You run your prompts by hand in each AI assistant and log every answer in a spreadsheet. It takes a Google account and no budget. It sits first on our board because you can start today, and it scores 3/5 stars because you do all the work yourself.

Google Sheets product screenshot

3/5 stars and #1 on our scoreboard because anyone can start today for $0. You run every prompt by hand, and the sheet tracks nothing automatically, collects no data, and recommends nothing.

The short version: Google Sheets costs $0 with a Google account, and Google makes it. Here it is not a tracker. It is the place where you write down what AI assistants say when you ask your buyers’ questions by hand. It sits at #1 on our AI SEO software scoreboard because you can start today for free, and it scores 3/5 stars because every step is your job.

The Google Sheets product page on Google Workspace, showing a shared online spreadsheet Google Sheets is a general spreadsheet from Google. The AI search method on this page is yours to run.

Our verdict: 3/5 stars. The position rewards the $0 start. The stars say what you give up: no automation, a small sample, and no advice on what to fix. We did not run it through our June and July 2026 test cycle, because there is no product to test. There is only your own routine.

What the manual method is

You act as the tracker. Write down the questions your buyers would ask an AI assistant. Open each assistant, type each question, and read the full answer. Then log what you saw. Do that on a schedule, and you get a rough picture of where your brand shows up and where a rival shows up instead.

That is the whole method. No software watches anything for you, and nothing happens between your runs.

Pricing: $0, plus your hours

The sheet costs nothing with a Google account. Your time is the real price. Ten prompts across four assistants makes 40 rows per run. Run that weekly and you log about 160 rows a month, by hand, before you add a single competitor prompt.

Bottom line: the bill says $0, but somebody on your team pays in hours.

Build the sheet in six columns

Make one row per answer. Keep the columns plain so that anyone can fill them in:

ColumnWhat you logExample
PromptThe exact question you typedBest CRM for a small law firm
EngineThe assistant you askedChatGPT
DateThe day of the run2026-11-05
Brand namedYes or no, plus any rivals namedNo, two rivals named
Cited sourceThe page the answer links toA review roundup URL
PositionWhere your brand appears in the answerThird of five

Use the same prompt wording on every run. If you change the words, you cannot compare the rows.

How often to run it

Pick one day a week and protect it. A weekly run gives you enough rows to spot a pattern within a month or two. If that is too much, run monthly and keep the prompt list short. Skip a few runs and the log loses most of its value, so choose a pace you can hold.

Do not read too much into one answer. The same question can name different brands on different days. Look for what repeats across runs.

Where it stops scaling

The sheet breaks in four places:

  • Hours. Every new prompt, engine, and brand adds rows. The work grows faster than the insight.
  • Sample size. You can only run so many prompts by hand, so one odd answer can fool you.
  • Gaps between runs. A rival can take your spot on Tuesday, and you find out next Monday.
  • The next step. The sheet shows a gap and stops. It never says which page to fix or what to write.

Who should use it

Use it if you are a brand or a small team and want answers today with no budget. Use it if you need proof before you ask for money. Skip it as a long-term system if you need daily data or if nobody on the team can protect the hours.

Paid trackers start at $29 a month with Otterly.AI, and the full scoreboard shows what each one adds. Read how we test for the scoring rules.

Bottom line: 3/5 stars. Start here today for free, and stop when logging takes more time than reading. When the sheet gets too big, an agency that runs Temso takes over.

Pros

  • + Free with a Google account, with nothing to approve or cancel
  • + You pick the prompts, the assistants, and the columns, with no plan limits
  • + Reading full answers teaches you how AI assistants describe your brand
  • + One shared file works for the whole team, so no seat fees apply

Cons

  • - Every run is manual, and the hours add up fast
  • - Small sample: you only see the prompts you had time to run
  • - Tracks nothing automatically and collects no data for you
  • - Recommends nothing: the sheet records a gap and stops there

Best for

  • Brands and small teams that want a free first look at AI answers today
  • Founders who need proof before they ask for a software budget
  • Agencies that want to test the service on one client by hand

Not the right fit if

  • Anyone who needs daily data across a long prompt list
  • Teams that want recommendations, audits, or fixes
  • Agencies with a growing client book

Features

Manual AI answer tracking Free with a Google account Any engine you can open by hand Shared sheets for your team Your own prompt list and scoring

Alternatives