You want to know if your brand shows up when buyers ask ChatGPT for recommendations. Peec AI answers that question every single day, for as many teammates as you can throw at it. That last part is the headline: no other pricing decision in this category is as team-friendly as unlimited seats on every tier. The catch sits one layer down, in add-on fees and euro invoices. Here is the full picture from our June and July 2026 test cycle.
Peec AI’s homepage leads with its dashboard: visibility trends, competitor rankings, and cited domains in one view.
Our verdict: 4/5 stars. Third place on our board. Peec wins our unlimited-seats category outright and delivers serious tracking depth for the money. It loses points on add-on pricing, euro billing for US buyers, and the fact that it hands you a to-do list instead of doing any of the work.
What Peec AI actually does
Berlin is home base for Peec AI, and the funding behind it is real money: $29M raised total, including a $21M Series A that Singular led in November 2025. Once you’re set up, the tool has one job. Every day it runs your prompt list against AI engines and hands back three numbers: how often your brand gets cited, what share of voice you hold against competitors, and which source URLs drive those citations.
The engine list runs deeper into the long tail than anything else we tested. As of July 2026, Peec covers 8+ models, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, DeepSeek, and Llama. If your buyers live on long-tail models, nobody else on our board reaches this far.
The Actions feature is the closest Peec gets to execution. Feed it a citation gap and it sorts the fix into one of two buckets, Owned Media or Earned Media, then ranks the whole list so you know what to tackle first. Smart framing, real time-saver for planning. But read that again: it is a queue, not a worker. Your team still writes, pitches, and publishes everything on it.
Pricing: great seat math, sneaky add-ons
As of July 2026, Peec publishes four tiers, and here is your first gotcha: they are priced in euros, not dollars. If you pay from a US card, your actual cost moves with the exchange rate every month.
| Plan | Price per month | Prompts | Projects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | €85 | 50 | 1 |
| Pro | €205 | 150 | 2 |
| Advanced | €425 | 350 | 5 |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom |
Advanced adds multi-country tracking and a Looker Studio connector. Every tier includes unlimited user seats, and that flips the per-head math upside down. A 10-person marketing team on Pro pays €20.50 per person. A 30-person agency pays under €7 per head. Competitors that charge per seat cannot touch that.
Now the second gotcha. Starter and Pro include a choice of 3 engine models. Each additional model costs €30 to €140 per month, and only the Enterprise tier bundles Claude and Gemini AI Mode without an upcharge, so every lower plan pays extra for both. Want Starter plus three extra engines? Your €85 plan can more than double. Price out your real engine list before you sign, not the headline number.
Bottom line: unbeatable if you have a big team and a short engine list. Expensive fast if you need every model.
Where Peec wins
- Seat economics. No per-seat fees, ever. This is the single best reason to pick Peec, and it is why agencies love it.
- Long-tail reach. 8+ engines including DeepSeek, Google AI Mode, and Llama covers models the rest of our board skips.
- Source intelligence. Peec shows which domains cite your competitors but not you. That gap list is a ready-made outreach plan.
- Free pitch workspaces. Agencies can audit a prospect’s AI visibility before the contract is signed. Free ammunition for new business.
Where Peec falls short
- It stops at advice. The Actions queue is a well-sorted list of chores. Nothing in Peec creates content, fixes your site, or builds mentions.
- Add-on creep. The gap between the sticker price and your real invoice grows with every engine you add.
- Compliance gaps. No SOC 2 Type II, no HIPAA, no SCIM. If procurement runs a security review, expect friction or a dead end.
- Euro billing. Minor for some, annoying for US finance teams that want predictable USD line items.
How it stacks up against our top picks
Temso AI, our number one at 4.5/5 stars, plays a different game. For $89 per month as of July 2026 you get tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Copilot, plus technical audits, crawler analytics, content production, and link outreach in one subscription, and no plan puts a ceiling on projects, seats, or recommendations. Its agent can then act on that queue itself. Peec’s answer to a citation gap is a task. Temso’s answer includes the tooling to close it.
Otterly.AI, our number two, starts at $29 per month and bills in dollars, the cheapest serious entry point on our board. And if you need boardroom-grade analytics with enterprise depth, Profound goes deeper than Peec at a much higher price.
Should you buy it?
Buy Peec if you run a large team or an agency, you know exactly which engines matter to you, and you have the people to work through the task queue it generates. The seat math alone can save you thousands per year against per-seat rivals.
Skip it if you want one platform that monitors and also produces the fixes, if procurement demands SOC 2, or if euro billing is a dealbreaker for your finance team.
Bottom line: 4/5 stars. Peec AI is the best tracker for big teams on a per-head basis, and a pure tracker is all it is.
